About four years ago, Paul Hollowell found out that Amazon
was making a gadget he desperately wanted: a camera whose sole purpose was to
photograph his clothes.
اضافة اعلان
The oval camera, called the Echo Look, worked by
photographing several clothing combinations and using artificial intelligence
to highlight which outfit looked best. Hollowell, an entrepreneur and a
frequent traveler from Dallas, usually spent hours picking clothes to pack for
a trip and believed that the camera would help him decide. He ordered one for
$200.
He was correct — the camera saved time. But what he didn’t
predict was that Amazon would send an email three years later with sad news:
The product and its app would soon cease to work. The company said it had
included some of the Echo Look’s features, like giving style advice, in more
popular Amazon products, so it was time to put the digital fashionista to rest.
Hollowell, 39, was angry.
“You can sunset the service, but at least let me use the
camera,” he said. “It just did nothing.”
Many have learned a hard lesson about what it means to be an
Amazon customer. Even when you’re paying lots of money, you are a guinea pig at
the whims of a company endlessly striving to innovate. At any moment, the
company could surprise you with an unwelcome change to an Amazon product you
own or decide to kill it altogether.
Last week, many people who own Amazon devices were
automatically enrolled in Sidewalk, a new internet-sharing program that drew
intense scrutiny. Basically, the program lets owners of newer Amazon products
share their internet connections with others nearby. If a neighbor’s Ring
camera has a spotty internet connection and yours has a strong one, you can
share your bandwidth with your neighbor.
That all sounds nice if everything works as expected, but
security experts have raised concerns that device makers could have
inappropriate access to people’s data. They advised that people opt out of the
program to avoid becoming part of Amazon’s experiment because there are still
many unknowns.
This high-risk, high-reward approach to innovation is woven
into Amazon’s culture. Jeff Bezos, the company’s founder, has said that
Amazon’s failures cost it billions of dollars. He once told investors that his
company was “the best place in the world to fail (we have a lot of practice!),
and failure and invention are inseparable twins.”
Indeed, Amazon’s unbridled embrace of failure has included
high-profile flops in consumer electronics. For about four years, it sold
millions of Amazon Dash Buttons, which you could push to replenish items like
toilet paper. Amazon killed the Dash in 2019, after orders placed through the
buttons significantly decreased. In 2014, the company aggressively marketed the
Fire, its first smartphone, and shelved it just a year later amid lukewarm
reviews and sluggish sales.
Amazon continues to experiment with kitschy ideas. Last
year, it unveiled an autonomous drone that flies around your home and shoots
video to catch intruders. The drone, which was widely panned by the press
because of privacy concerns, has yet to be released. Halo, a fitness product
that Amazon claims can tell you precisely how fat you are, received mixed
ratings from professional reviewers and early customers, including complaints
that the gadget could give people body dysmorphia.
Why does Amazon, a brand that probably knows more about what
we want to buy than any other company, need to sell us experimental products
just to figure out what it’s doing? Tech companies big and small typically do
their research and development in house before releasing products to us.
What’s more, when Amazon fails like this, you, the guinea
pig, lose your hard-earned cash and a product you may enjoy.
There is also an
environmental impact: The electronic device could end up in a landfill, and
even if you recycle it, only a small portion of its materials can be reused.
Lisa Levandowski, an Amazon spokeswoman, said that internal
teams tested the company’s inventions extensively but that, because they were
novel and ambitious, customer feedback could help improve them. This approach allows
Amazon to make products like the Echo and Alexa what they are today, she said.
Design veterans with experience creating products for Big
Tech brands like Apple and Samsung confirmed that Amazon’s method was atypical.
My general recommendation is to think twice before buying cutting-edge tech
products made by Amazon — and if you do, be aware of the risk.
Slow and Steady vs On-the-Fly Innovation
A television, no matter how thin, makes an ugly centerpiece
in a living room once it’s turned off. With this in mind, Yves Béhar, a Swiss
designer, teamed with Samsung to design a TV that could blend into the room
like an art piece, he said.
They took a slow and patient approach.
Béhar said he and Samsung designers had started with making
observations about consumers: Homes were getting smaller, and tastes were
becoming more eclectic. With that insight, the product developers worked with
curators in museums and galleries to assemble art that could be shown on the
TV.
After a few years of testing prototypes and forming
partnerships to procure artwork, the collaboration resulted in the 2017
introduction of the Frame TV, a Samsung television that resembled a picture
frame. It used motion sensors to show art when people were present and shut off
when nobody was around. The TV has become a bestseller.
Béhar, who founded Fuseproject, an industrial design firm,
said he understood Amazon’s approach as a retail company to rapidly test ideas
— like when it measures how customers respond to different prices in its
stores. But “with hardware, people end up being left with stuff that’s useless
or doesn’t work anymore,” he said. “In the world that we live in today, with
global warming and plastics and waste, I do think it’s something to be very
careful about.”
Don Norman, who founded the Design Lab at the University of
California, San Diego, and wrote the book “The Design of Everyday Things,” said
that throughout his career, he had seen some other companies use approaches
similar to Amazon’s.
In the 1990s, when Norman worked with Apple as a user
experience architect, the company collaborated with Sony on a product. He said
Apple had planned to spend years doing market research and testing prototypes
before shipping it.
“Sony laughed at us and said: ‘What a stupid way of doing
things. We just build a product, and we sell it. We get the feedback, and we
kill it and do a better one. It’s much more efficient and faster than your
method,’” Norman said.
This on-the-fly approach to development is unpopular, he
said, because most companies recognize that customers get angry when gadgets
are quickly killed.
“There’s some logic to it but also a complete disrespect to
what it might mean to your customers or environment or the world,” Norman said.
Kyle Wiens, the chief executive of iFixit, a company that
sells parts for people to repair gadgets, said there were better ways than
Amazon’s to discontinue products. When Pebble, a smartwatch maker, shut down in
2016, the company said the software would continue to work. People continued to
enjoy the product years after the company’s death.
Norman’s advice for consumers is simple: Protest. Amazon is
more likely to change its ways if people complain when they are treated as
guinea pigs and steer clear of experimental gadgets like surveillance drones
until they are proved to be lasting products.
Hollowell is an example of how tough it can be to pacify
unhappy customers. When Amazon was announcing the death of the Echo Look, the
company sent two emails. The first included a promotional code to get a newer
product, the Echo Show 5, for free. Hollowell took the offer but found that the
Echo Show was a poor substitute: The camera was subpar and lacked software to
organize his closet, he said.
The second email was a reminder that the Echo Look would
soon be dead and that it could be recycled. Hollowell missed the part about
recycling.
“I very distinctly remember putting it in the trash one day
because it just wasn’t working,” he said.
Read more
Lifestyle
.jpg)
.jpg)
