The other day, I was looking at my baby, and I had a little
thought: Should I toss a slice of cheese on him? I had watched some videos on
my phone of what appeared to be Kraft Singles smacking the faces of crying
infants, rendering them stunned and bewildered. The videos had been spliced
into a mashup and served to me on Instagram as a looping carousel of orange
squares thwacking babies silly. My baby was not crying, but that would give me
time to prepare: Open the fridge, unwrap the slice, position the camera and
take aim.
اضافة اعلان
The phenomenon of the “cheese-slice trick” (or the “
baby cheese challenge”) is mildly rude, but it isn’t new. I first saw the videos
circulating several years ago. I sensed that they had returned to my feed because
I had viewed a different social media trend involving kids, a pantry staple and
the element of surprise: the “
egg-crack challenge,” a recent viral prank in
which parents film selfie videos of themselves cooking with their young
children, only to — surprise! — forcefully crack eggs on their heads and
capture the emotional fallout.
The trend began with people egging the foreheads of
unsuspecting adults. Then they started targeting littler heads and producing
bigger reactions. Many of the children cried, and for some reason, that made
the parents laugh. The footage was unsettling, which only helped to extend its
reach. Internet child care experts joined the food fight with their own videos
expressing disapproval. When the cheese clips resurfaced, it felt like the
algorithm was mounting a rebuttal. Like: See? It’s totally fine to hit your
kids with food and post it online! The cheese actually makes them stop crying.
Egg or cheese, baby or toddler, tears or silence —
humiliation thrums through all of these scenes. Why would parents want to
publicly debase their own children? Social media clout is one explanation, but
I don’t think it’s the only one. Watching an egg-cracking compilation on
TikTok, I noticed something: As a mother films herself with her young daughter,
the mother’s eyes rove restlessly between the child (whom she has just egged)
and the phone (which is mirroring the scene back to her). She tries to offer
assurances — “it’s OK, you’re OK” — even as she is drawn back to the screen,
cackling at the spectacle of her child turning pink with anger.
That is the eeriest part of these videos — the parents are
barely interacting with their kids. Instead, they are relating to a mirror
image of their children that they are spreading online. And they are reveling
in their power over that image.
Children in crisis have been an on-screen fascination since
the beginning of screens. In the Lumière brothers’ 1896 silent short “
Querelle Enfantine,” two fancy babies in lace bonnets grapple over a silver spoon from
adjacent high chairs, slapping and wailing and then consoling each other as the
filmmakers, presumably, look on. More recently, similarly embarrassing footage
has been mailed into “
America’s Funniest Home Videos,” forwarded in chain
emails and uploaded to YouTube.
But
TikTok and its Instagram competitor, Reels, have made
such content ubiquitous. You need not be a filmmaker or even a dedicated family
vlogger to casually offer your offspring to the viral gods. The apps are always
coursing with some new prompt beckoning parents to show off their big babies,
their ugly babies, their ugly babies’ glow-ups. It feels so easy: You’ve got
your phone, you’ve got your kid, and because of the kid, you’ve got nothing
else to do except look at your phone. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the
egg-crack challenge took off at the end of August, in the desperate final days
of summer break.
It’s seductive for new parents to think of our children as
extensions of ourselves, and social media makes that fantasy visceral. Profiles
that once featured pictures of our own faces now center snapshots of our
children. Babies are cute (even the ones their parents advertise as ugly), and
their emotions are sweeping and operatic. Plus, as we grow older and less
algorithmically favored, our children teem with beauty and verve. When they are
babies, objectifying them feels straightforward: We wheel them around, we dress
them and feed them, we choreograph their lives. Babies at least seem within our
control. Toddlers, famously, do not.
If the cheese-slice trick imagines the baby as a kind of
benign Mr. Potato Head figure, the egg-crack challenge views the toddler as a
Whac-a-Mole, a wily adversary that needs to be thumped into submission. Both
trends imagine that the child itself functions like a gadget, with a “
docile switch” or a “
grumpy switch” that can be toggled for our own comfort or
amusement. Inside the phone, a child can be coached, filmed, reshot, spliced
and filtered. A child can be saved, or it can be deleted.
I did not cheese my baby, as he is a dignified individual.
And I didn’t crack an egg on my toddler’s forehead, either, because, as one
young
TikTok target explained to her caretakers, “Hey, that wasn’t very nice.”
But I do photograph and film my children obsessively. I do this because, even
though I know that they are becoming their own people, I want to keep a trace
of them for myself.
D.W. Winnicott wrote about the transitional object, a little
stuffed animal or swatch of blanket that a baby uses to soothe itself as it
begins to separate from its caregivers. Parents have transitional objects, too:
our phones, which we use to ease our own separation anxiety. Sometimes, my
toddler laughs when he is nervous or overwhelmed, and I wonder if those
feelings drive the parents’ laughter, too. Our babies won’t always be babies.
Our children are growing up. They are growing away from us. And if we pelt them
with eggs, they may not come back to visit.
Read more Technology
Jordan News
.jpg)
.jpg)
