WASHINGTON – Analysts
confirm that the change in the American stance towards the Zionist aggression
on the Gaza Strip is linked to disagreements between the US administration and
the leaders of the Zionist entity, especially after the failure of the occupying
army to achieve any of its stated objectives since the start of this aggression
on October 7.
اضافة اعلان
According to Jo 24,
Political analysts believe that the
American position on the genocidal actions committed by the occupation forces in Gaza is influenced by several factors.
The most prominent of these is the impact of this position on the situation of
US President Joe Biden in the upcoming presidential elections, as well as the
interests and image of the United States globally. Additionally, there have
been breaches in the US administration that oppose the practices of the Zionist
entity and reject Washington's stance on them.
Dr. Abdulhakim
Al-Hasban, a political writer and anthropology professor, stated that a major
power like the United States does not view global interests through a single
lens. President Joe Biden announced a new stance on the
war in Gaza, and the
timing of this decision was crucial and intelligent to have a political impact
on Israel.
Hasban explained that
this scenario was expected, as America wanted Netanyahu to engage in war to
deplete his ammunition and satisfy the Israeli public after the operation on
October 7, which had a significant impact. Reports from the Israeli National Security
Advisor indicated that deterring Hamas and eliminating its threat would take
about two decades.
He pointed out that
the strategic thinking of the occupation differs from that of the United
States. Netanyahu's thinking does not extend beyond Gaza and the northern part
of the entity and countries in the "Axis of Resistance." On the other
hand, American strategic thinking is global, involving different calculations
with the involvement of state institutions such as the
Pentagon, the State
Department, and the CIA. Netanyahu acts as if he were the king of Israel due to
his 16-year tenure, and the Israeli people see him that way due to historical
background.
According to Hasban,
the mindset of the Biden administration is different from that of Trump's era.
However, Biden's era witnessed the election of the most extreme government in
the Zionist entity. There are different calculations within the US administration,
with a focus on elections that will impact Biden's future. Continuing the war
is not in Biden's interest, and there have been visible differences between the
US administration and Israeli leaders since the beginning of the war.
Dr. Mondher
Al-Hawarat, a writer and political analyst, stated that there are disagreements
between the US administration and the
Zionist entity on some secondary issues,
including the behavior of settlers, the timing of ending the ground operation,
modifying the government, and removing extremists. This practically means the
end of Netanyahu according to him.
Hawarat added that the
United States still supports the occupation, providing it with money and
weapons. The announcements are made for electoral purposes for Biden, who
became embarrassed due to the genocidal actions, displacement, and destruction
carried out by the occupation forces. His administration has faced several
setbacks.
He emphasized that the
resilience of the resistance and the inability of the occupation army to end
the battles played a significant role in changing the language of discourse in
America. Additionally, there are disagreements with Netanyahu over who will
manage Gaza after the war.
Dr. Khaled Shnoukhat,
the President of the
Jordanian Association for Political Science, stated that
the American stance on the genocidal war on Gaza began to change when the
United States felt that this war had not achieved any results 68 days after it
started, especially since the occupation forces failed to enter Shuja'iyya and
would need several weeks to achieve that, which other countries worldwide would
not tolerate.
Shnoukhat added that
the significant losses suffered by the occupation army and, especially, the
Golan Brigade, which is considered an elite force with the killing of some of
its leaders, made the United States realize the prolonged duration of the war. This
prompted them to search for alternatives to stop it.
He noted that the
large losses incurred by the occupation army and the resistance's steadfastness
played a major role in changing global public opinion and within Israeli
society. The occupation army and Israeli society cannot endure the continued
large losses in lives.
Shnoukhat emphasized
that statements by
Benny Gantz, one of the three leaders in the War Cabinet,
saying, "The war is big, and the losses are greater," are evidence of
not being able to endure those losses and the beginning of discontent. He believes
refusal by Hamas to negotiate without a ceasefire will be a condition for
reaching a new ceasefire agreement.
Read more Region and World
Jordan News
.jpg)
.jpg)
