With the
introduction of GPT-4 and Claude, AI has taken another big step forward. GPT-4
is human-level or better at many hard tasks, a huge improvement over GPT-3.5,
which was released only a few months ago. Yet amid the debate over these
advances, there has been very little discussion of one of the most profound
effects of AI large language models: how they will reshape childhood.
اضافة اعلان
In the future,
every middle-class kid will grow up with a personalized AI assistant — so long
as the parents are OK with that.
As for the
children, most of them will be willing if not downright eager. When I was four
years old, I had an imaginary friend who lived under the refrigerator, called
(ironically) Bing Bing. I would talk to him and report his opinions to my
parents and sister.
In the near
future, such friends will be quite real, albeit automated, and they will talk
back to our children as directly as we wish. Having an AI service for your
child will be as normal as having a pet, except the AI service will never bite.
It will be carried around in something like a tablet, though with a design that
is oriented toward the AI.
Recent developments
suggest that AI models can be both commoditized and customized more easily and
cheaply than expected. So parents will be able to choose what kind of companion
they want their kids to have — in contrast to the free-for-all of the internet.
The available services likely will include education and tutoring, text or
vocalizations of what the family pet might be thinking, dancing cartoon
avatars, and much more. Companies will compete to offer products that parents
think will be good for their kids. Some of the AIs might even read bedtime
stories (in fact, I have already heard some of them).
Many parents may be reluctant to let their kids become attached to an AI. But I predict that most families will welcome it. For one, parents will be able to turn off the connection whenever they wish. Simply clicking a button is easier than yanking an iPad out of a kid’s grasp.
Many parents
may be reluctant to let their kids become attached to an AI. But I predict that
most families will welcome it. For one, parents will be able to turn off the
connection whenever they wish. Simply clicking a button is easier than yanking
an iPad out of a kid’s grasp.
Most of all,
letting your kid have an AI companion will bring big advantages. Your child
will learn to read and write much faster and better, and will do better in
school. Or maybe you want your kid to master Spanish or Chinese, but you cannot
afford an expensive tutor who comes only twice a week. Do you want your child
to learn how to read music? The AI services will be as limited or as expansive
as you want them to be.
It is an open
question how quickly schools will embrace these new methods of learning. At
some point, however, they will become part of the curriculum. Competitive
pressures will make parents reluctant to withhold AI from their kids. Even if
the AIs are not present in the classroom, some kids will use them to help do
their homework, gaining a big advantage, and the practice will likely spread.
Of course
children will use these AIs for purposes far beyond what their parents intend.
They will become playthings, companions, entertainers and much more. When I was
a kid, with no internet and mediocre TV, I created imaginary worlds in the
dirt, or with simple household items, and my parents often had no clue. The AI
services will become part of this model of spontaneous play, even if parents
try to make them purely educational.
What about
teenagers? Well, many parents may allow their kids to speak with AI therapists.
It might be better than nothing, and perhaps better than many human therapists.
It is easy
enough to imagine the problems. Socially conservative parents will not be able
to stop their kids from visiting friends whose AIs teach about sex education.
Many kids may manage to “jailbreak” their AIs, getting them talking about sex
and violence, even in an educational context (try Roman history). And while the
rise of AI will not necessarily increase inequality, it is hard to argue that
it will not confer even more advantages on wealthy and middle-class kids.
But the biggest
drawback might simply be that the AI services work too well, and kids become
very attached to them, neglecting friends and family. They might be such good
babysitters that parents will not always pull the plug when they should. They
might, in short, be the 21st century version of television.
What will it be
like to grow up with such companions? Nobody really knows. But an entire
generation is about to find out.
Tyler Cowen is
a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He is a professor of economics at George Mason University
and writes for the blog Marginal Revolution. He is coauthor of “Talent: How to
Identify Energizers, Creatives, and Winners Around the World.”
Read more Opinion and Analysis
Jordan News
.jpg)
.jpg)
