Hoping for a more vital economy

Yusuf Mansur
The writer is CEO of the Envision Consulting Group and former minister of state for economic affairs. (Photo: Jordan News)
It has become common practice to say that we, in Jordan, are heading the way of Lebanon; that is, what happened there would happen here. This is so far from the truth. Unfortunately, few people know what happened in Lebanon and how the crisis there came about.اضافة اعلان

Lebanon is undergoing a financial meltdown that is spawning one of the worst economic and human catastrophes in centuries. People have come to witness their livelihoods and savings disappear.

The story began in 1997 when the central bank (Bank of Lebanon), in order to maintain faith in the Lebanese economy, pegged the Lebanese lira to the US dollar (LL1,507=$1). The policy proved successful for a while. A visitor to Lebanon would carry either liras or dollars and have no problem using either. It was dual currency economy.

But it also meant that banks had to hold large amounts of dollar deposits in order to meet the demands for exchange at any time. Lebanese firms needed dollars to pay for imports, which also increased the pressure on banks to have dollars. Note that Lebanon is a country that relied for foreign currency on three primary sources: remittances from the Lebanese in the diaspora (mainly the Gulf countries), tourism, and aid from the capital surplus countries of the Gulf and the West.

As long as these inflows kept coming, the dollars were available to meet the demand and the economy was relatively stable. However, the Arab Spring changed things: Syria, which was once a large trade partner, was facing financial trouble; remittances started to fall; aid from the oil rich Gulf countries, for political reasons, started to falter and later came to a halt; tourism, with the promise of violent flare-ups, dwindled to almost nothing; foreign direct investment dried up as the US and others considered Hezbollah a terrorist organization; and the port explosion topped it all up.
... To be able to meet such an obligation, the only way for banks was to pay the initial depositors with money from new depositors, which is better known as a money pyramid or Ponzi Scheme.

With the disruption in dollar inflows, the private banks, with the blessings of the Bank of Lebanon, devised the following plan: private banks are to offer generous interest rates (15-20 percent) on dollar deposits to keep the dollars coming. However, to be able to meet such an obligation, the only way for banks was to pay the initial depositors with money from new depositors, which is better known as a money pyramid or Ponzi Scheme. But once people realized that a Ponzi scheme is at play, they panicked and started asking for their money back, which caused a run on banks. Banks, not having the money, refused to pay, and the conundrum started. Consequently, the lira exchange rate dropped by 90 percent after 2019.

Three events in 2020 did not help matters either: the government tried to impose taxes on WhatsApp calls in a country that is considered the most expensive in the world in terms of telephony; COVID-19 wiped out tourism and any hopes of recovery; and the explosion of the port in Beirut devastated whatever hopes for recovery existed.

So, how similar is this to the case Jordan? Not at all!

The unemployment rate in Jordan has been declining from a high of 25 percent in the first quarter of 2021 to 23.2 in the third quarter of the same year; exports have risen by 18 percent in 2021, tourism is back to pre-2020 levels, private banks have JD60 billion (194 percent of the GDP) in deposits and $13 billion in foreign currency, plus JD39 billion in domestic currency deposits, credit facilities exceed JD30 billion, and the Central Bank of Jordan has $18 billion (9.3 months’ worth of imports).

The public debts of the two countries are not comparable either. Jordan has a national debt of 114.6 percent of the GDP, while Lebanon has a national debt of 158 percent. Almost half of Jordan’s debt is to international organizations at concessionary rates (4 percent) and for long periods (15 years) while most of Lebanon’s debt is to private banks, for short periods and at 15 percent.

Hence, there really is nothing to compare. Let us start believing that tomorrow will bring a brighter and more vital economy in Jordan.


The writer is CEO of the Envision Consulting Group and former minister of state for economic affairs.


Read more Opinion and Analysis