Unfair competition not only asphyxiates evolution and
progress, it paralyzes structures and institutions, totally or partially.
Marketplace, monopolies — whether complete or partial — create disadvantaged
segments that normally have what it takes to compete fairly.
اضافة اعلان
Oligopolies can also prevent free competition.
Market-generated monopolies and oligopolies are very rare in mature competitive
political and economic environments. They do, however, exist in immature
competitive markets which are influenced by political power, especially of the kind
that is not attained through competitive processes that ensure the basic values
of a competitive democratic political order.
When economic power resources are concentrated in
the hands of “the few”, political power follows. Therefore, lack of free economic
competition leads to monopolies and oligopolies, which create concentration of
political power and lead to a non-democratic political order because of unfair
competition.
In Jordan, the concentration of energy resources in
the protected monopoly of the oil refinery and the single buyer model of the
national electricity company NEPCO are cases in point.
Although it is going to be a tough journey to align
individuals and institutions with the principle of free competition as the only
path toward progress, it is essential that we establish the proper discourse to
make it an integral value of our political, economic, administrative, and
educational systems. Competition is a progressive value that is rooted in the
intrinsic human desire to pursue the best outcome based on the invested effort.
We owe it to our youth and children to leave them a country they deserve. After all, it is our responsibility that we brought them into this world and we have to ensure their human dignity and wellbeing now and in the future.
With the triangular approach of political, economic,
and administrative reform that has produced three documents to take the country
forward, we need to address the shortcomings as we implement reform plans.
There is a need to revisit some assumptions and practices from the past.
While the political modernization and economic
vision have very clear goals and objectives, the administrative reform plan
needs more clarity, boldness, and teeth to intensify competitive progress and
access to public sector jobs.
The public sector should be framed as a system that
amplifies positive competition and reward, as opposed to uncompetitive access
and automatic promotions. This requires immediate digitization of government
services. We have no time to wait and no one will wait for us to get our act
together. Every other competitor is leapfrogging and we have been at turtle
speed.
The highly competitive world we live in today will
not wait for our incompetence to become competent. We have to bypass the
bureaucratic hurdles and move much faster than the administrative reform plan
proposes.
Competition in the public sector, education, labor,
politics, and the free market economy that we aspire to achieve is not a
luxury, it is an overdue necessity. If one does well, one should not be afraid
of competition. The role of government here is to regulate fairly with the
interest of the people, all, and not some of the people, at heart. This is how
we create the marketplace for free and fair competition across the board while
we do away with monopolies and oligopolies.
We owe it to our youth and children to leave them a
country they deserve. After all, it is our responsibility that we brought them
into this world and we have to ensure their human dignity and wellbeing now and
in the future.
Fares Braizat is the chairman of NAMA Strategic Intelligence Solutions and former
minister of youth, [email protected]
Read more Opinion and Analysis
Jordan News
.jpg)
.jpg)
